The interview is not a gamble. -Evaluating interviewer and elaboration.

“See Tate says, also fell into! 」
“I’m always falls in the last interview! 」
“I was what I strained the good! 」
“For example is it if you answered the question? 」

In the toughest event produced and evaluated “personality” and “behavior” （ interviewer ） others first life and interviewing and significant impact on the life sentence. What harsh? It is a reason fell from heck know.

In most cases the interviewer does not tell you reason fell. Are also very rarely tell interviewers might believe duty is not usually teach. In it, it のたうちまわって, knowing the cause who fell down again too.

Well, what do? The answer is as follows:

1. Export all interactions with the interviewer recalled.
2. And scoring one, discovered the improvements to fix.
3. From this work had to continue.

“So spicy you can’t! “And you might think. It is indeed hard work, spicy indefinitely continue missed appointment same mistake 100 times better. Question what answered what, immediately after the interview, would export more. -Improve it little by little the Foundation.

Write steps back closer to the informal “from the next page.

Let’s try Let’s.

※ Next, try export all stories of the interview!

※ With the rejection reason interviewers will tell you how good I think. Example reasons fell for peer-reviewed papers, peer-reviewed results must be written, and fixes. That’s also dropped many benefits. Once you know the interview also fell to the same reason. And ready to ensure students students there is worth the efforts and, good corporate results and grow or think?

If the appointment is balanced by the way, ※ personnel will surely tell the reason. Try ask a personnel appointment took everybody, just for that? For advice to the juniors.

[STEP.1] try export all stories of the interview!

Exporting all stories, though, is 1 word phrase. All things considered,

• “What is asked”
• What answer? ”

. Let us remember the good luck.
Written examples below. This viewpoint arranged the questions actually asked by publishers actually. Furthermore, power for this company is in power to challenge.

1. Motives are?
   Paraphrasing the power to challenge fails from what power “and”. Also, spoke acquired the power how tennis circle or episode. Only from finally can demonstrate its power, told the company’s first-choice.
    
2. Where’s the aspiring Department?
   You want coverage of sporting ties.
    
3. After assignment to different departments do?
   Department not intended so that should be even always learn from it and go and challenge.
    
4. The favorite books?
   Kotaro 沢木 ‘ Midnight Express ‘.
    
5. Favorite travel destination is?
   Town conservation was Yamaguchi, Shimonoseki city, Chofu six months ago.
    
6. Talent like that?
   Kaori Manabe uplift.
    
7. When you think about editing planning book, travel destinations, and talent?
   Feelings felt in bathing culture and history of conservation, Kotaro 沢木 and Manabe uplift, Chofu City carved there not be serialized in the relay. Will add the simultaneously examined in Internet blogs and city-specific information. Readers will want to enjoy the city article and blog and back and forth, visit the following context.
    
8. Love karaoke?
   I like you.
    
9. What to sing?
   MR. It is a “never-ending journey” of the CHILDREN. Kotaro 沢木 “Midnight Express” of to sync the last scene.
    
10. When you meet people really be incompatible, then what?
    I disagree 100% who are not. Where the goodness of the people? Want to enjoy the looking hard to reverse.

Now, let’s to score on the next page!

※ Next page, and scored interactions in the interview, seeking out the improvement!

※ Good to you so down soon after, bought a small note for employment activities. It’s making his only career book.

[STEP.2] interact in the interview, and seek out the improvements!

Well, try to score. Scoring method is simple. Let’s count out the following criteria.

1. Replied to the question only…. minus 1 point
2. Along with the answer and why considering originality: 0 points
3. Told that people with answers and reasons for considering the originality… 1 point

The result is below. In total one minus.

1. Motives are? -/-1 Points
   Adds “fails from what power, originality is telling.
    
2. Where’s the aspiring Department? 1 Point-and-minus
   Not talking about the power and why you want coverage of the relationship between sports challenge.
    
3. After assignment to different departments do? -/-1 Points
   Talking about power challenge “must learn that there should be” and why.
    
4. The favorite books? 1 Point-and-minus
   “Midnight Express” not talking about chose also to challenge power.
    
5. Favorite travel destination is? -/-0 Points
   Why we chose “Chofu” said.
    
6. Talent like that? 1 Point-and-minus
   “Kaori Manabe uplift” not talking about chose also to challenge power.
    
7. When you think about editing planning book, travel destinations, and talent? -/-0 Points
   Have some originality of the project, not talking about the power to challenge.
    
8. Love karaoke? 1 Point-and-minus
   Why even force to challenge not mentioned.
    
9. What to sing? -/-0 Points
   There is little originality, not talking about the power to challenge.
    
10. When you meet people really be incompatible, then what? -/-1 Points
    Opponents disagree with anything I and like to challenge the power and how it specifically mentioned.

Unfortunately it has become minus one point. Other students, of course, minus 2 points if you would pass. However, and final interview class to higher level of rivals. Therefore conceded zero, have 重ねなければ plus. If you think and say nice things once conceded conversations with other is bad.

“It is impossible to express power for all of the conversations! 」

Of course it is. But why should can always tell the originality of its own. I.e. it can suppress the 0 point.

Think you want.
Interviewer plays favorite talent has decided pass someone? I wonder what singing karaoke or decide pass/fail. No such translation. Nice, if you like someone, or sang what. But that measure or know that you can expand the conversation from there and begin to tell what this interview.

“Favorite food? 」
“Is the banana”

Follow the conversation in this. It’s unlikely edit is anxious that people at all. And, regardless of editing, unable to catch conversations interview appointment is not absolute.

—————–

To falls in the interview you also challenged many times.

But of course is quite bad at it narrowly fell to reverse might sometimes.

That’s why interview “conversations” and, always try tempered their originality. Continue the conversations come thinking and the interviewer wants to talk more.

And it’s telling you that you seek to find opportunities to have.

Reliably while reducing conceded, surely will add points.

It is waiting to welcome the appointment.

※ Check items that affect such character of aerial work platforms, such as the expression and posture, voice, outfits, room and seating, telephone support, CV and photo pass or fail the other numerous. But like all even reluctant no need to purposely runs each check. Staff of the Division of employment and friends all ask check. In the third person perspective.