NVIDIA GeForce GTX of 560. MSIs twin Frozr II and Zotacs AMP!

Written by Reinhard Strauss. Posted in Graphics cards. 11 views

Introduction

Between the GeForce GTX 460 and the GeForce GTX, a fairly large performance gap of more than 30 percent gap 560 TI. What would have been still absolutely normal a few years ago, is rather unusual in 2011, because especially in the low and medium-sized Preisgefügen, the 3D-Probanden cavort so closely to narrow that follows usually in steps of ten the next product.

In addition, NVIDIA is certainly not just right, that is the Radeon HD 6850 mostly before the GeForce GTX 460 and the Radeon HD 5850 is living a relatively safe existence of the “old guard”. This end is to now and NVIDIA sends the GeForce GTX 560 (without TI) on the market.

The special thing about the show: Unlike all other video cards are there no real reference design. The manufacturer allows for a wide margin at the frequencies, so that almost no GeForce GTX 560 of others to the same.

We have the MSI GeForce GTX 560 twin Frozr II and the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 560 AMP! invited for this article in our test lab, both have to prove whether they are worth their money.

Key technical data

Technically the GeForce GTX 560 is no too exciting product, because in the end it is 560 Ti, which has strong similarities with the GeForce GTX 460 apart of the clock rates, only a slightly attenuated GeForce GTX. As a GPU is on the run of the current GF114 used, which is manufactured in the 40-nm process from TSMC.

Thus the improvements compared to the predecessor of GF104 are automatically available. So NVIDIA has investigated all transistors on the GF104 and used on the GF114 (if possible) with a slower switching time, to be able to save more on power consumption.

On the GeForce GTX 560, a streaming multiprocessors (SM) of GF114 is disabled by default so that seven SMs are active. Pro SM, there are 48 of scalar beer, which can calculate a MADD (multiply-ADD) per cycle. This makes a total 336 Shadereinheiten – exactly as many as on the GeForce GTX 460.

A texture clusters with eight full text ureinheiten is connected to every SM, that can address a pixel and texture. 56 TMUs are left of the up to 64 TMUs. Do not forget be allowed the seven “sleep” engines (one per SM), for the geometry and tessellation performance of the GPU are responsible.

On the GeForce GTX 560, there are four 64-bit wide memory controller, which generates a 256-bit memory interface. Thus, VRAM sizes of 1,024 MB and 2,048 MB are possible, that will come on the market. Each controller as usual hangs a ROP cluster with eight ROPs, which makes the number to its 32 faltered.

On the “standard clock rates” of the GeForce GTX 560 is only so much say that there are no requirements of NVIDIA and the manufacturers to have free hand. Makes it currently appears currently as the slowest graphics card with a TMU domain 810 MHz, a Shaderfrequenz of 1,620 MHz and a memory clock of 2.004 MHz would work. This apparently is the minimum benefit, a GeForce GTX-560-buyer is received, we have determined this information as a “Standard” for a GeForce GTX 560. Most Partner cards will work expected to be a little faster, but the differences should be but rarely felt.

The fastest known GeForce GTX 560 works, however, with 950 MHz or 1900 MHz (as and shader clock), while the GDDR5 memory with 2,200 to works. In the latter, there will be still faster Partner cards, with 2.244 MHz likely to the maximum.

Due to the numerous different clock rates, there is no indication of the maximum power consumption from NVIDIA. On Windows it should focus strongly 560 TI on the GeForce GTX; MSI is for the GeForce GTX 560 twin Frozr II (with and without OC) to a value of 150 Watts – 20 Watts less than with TI-version. According to NVIDIA, there will be two six pin power plug at each design.

< div >

Radeon
HD 6850
Radeon
HD 6870
GeForce
GTX 460
1,024 MB
GeForce
GTX 560
GeForce
GTX 560 TI
Logo
Chip Bart’s Bart’s GF104 GF114 GF114
Transistors approximately 1.7 billion approximately 1.7 billion approx. 1.95 billion approx. 1.95 billion approx. 1.95 billion
Production 40 nm 40 nm 40 nm 40 nm 40 nm
Core clock 775 MHz 900 MHz 675 MHz 810 MHz 822 MHz
Shader clock 775 MHz 900 MHz 1,350 MHz 1,620 MHz 1,645 MHz
Shader units
(MADD)
192 (5 D) 224 (5 D) 336 (1 D) 336 (1 D) 384 (1 D)
FLOPs (MAD) 1.488 GFLOPs 2.016 GFLOPs 907 GFLOPs 1,088 GFLOPs 1,253 GFLOPs
ROPs 32 32 32 32 32
Pixel fill rate 24.800 Generation / s 28,800 Generation / s 18.900 Generation / s 22.680 Generation / s 26.304 Generation / s
TMUs 48 56 56 56 64
T 48 56 56 56 64
Texelfuellrate 37,200 MTex / s 50.400 MTex / s 37.800 MTex / s 45.360 MTex / s 52.608 MTex / s
Shader model SM 5 SM 5 SM 5 SM 5 SM 5
Hybrid-CF /-SLI X X X X X
effective Windows
Power saving
Amount of memory 1024 MB GDDR5 1024 MB GDDR5 1024 MB GDDR5 1024 MB GDDR5 1024 MB GDDR5
Memory clock 2,000 MHz 2100 MHz 1,800 MHz 2.004 MHz 2.004 MHz
Memory interface 256-Bit 256-Bit 256-Bit 256-Bit 256-Bit
Memory bandwidth 128,000 MB / s 134.400 MB / s 115,200 MB / s 128.256 MB / s 128.256 MB / s
Current data
Typical/maximum
127 /? Watt 151 /? Watt 160 /? Watt 150 /? Watt 170 /? Watt

The test candidate

MSI GeForce GTX 560 twin Frozr II OC

MSI sends for the launch of two different “GeForce GTX 560″ variants in the race: the GeForce GTX 560 twin Frozr II (available for the time being not in Germany), as well as the somewhat flottere GeForce GTX 560 twin Frozr II OC, where is has met the latter with us in the test lab. From 185 EUR, the Accelerator from today on the market should be available.

MSI GeForce GTX 560 twin Frozr II OC looks visually absolutely identical to the GeForce GTX 560 TI twin Frozr II in OC, as the manufacturer apparently took the “older” graphics card as a template. The PCB is a not quite cm 23 in length, with the cooler on the PCB out rises and the total length of the video card is so 24 cm. Two six pin power plug are necessary for the maximum power consumption, according to MSI amounting to 150 watts.

The cooler comes from the famous twin-Frozr II series and has no surprises. A cooling block of aluminium, where in turn many aluminum lamellas find their place, which occupy almost the entire front of the card, is placed directly on the GF114-GPU. In addition, there are four heatpipes.

Two large in diameter 75 mm axial fans provide the necessary fresh air and an active fan control to keep them in check – we investigate whether this works in the cooling section. Newly added to come is a small heat sink that is placed on the power supply. These remains of the remaining twin-Frozr II cards usually untreated.

TMU domain of the MSI GeForce GTX 560 twin Frozr II OC is the Shaderdomäne with 1,740 MHz and the 1024 MB GDDR5 memory produced by Samsung, 2,040 MHz approached 870 MHz,. Windows clock to the components on 51, 101 and 135 MHz down to to save electricity.

< div >

The bracket is with two dual-link DVI-as well as provide a mini HDMI output of the generation 1.4a. The facilities of the MSI card is composed of two electricity, a DVI to D-SUB-as well as a mini-HDMI to HDMI-adapter together. There is a driver CD with the hotel’s own Afterburner tool software supplement.

< div >

MSI GeForce GTX 560 twin Frozr II OC
Feature Expression
PCB Design Own design
Length 23 cm (PCB)
24 cm (total length)
Power supply 2 x 6-pin
Cooler Design Twin-Frozr-II cooler, 2 slot
Heat sink Alu core, aluminum radiator, four heatpipes
Fan 2 x 75 mm (axial)
Fan control Yes
Clock
Power (standby)
GPU 870 (51 MHz)
Shader 1,740 MHz (101 MHz)
Memory 2,040 MHz (135 MHz)
Memory size 1024 MB GDDR5, Samsung
Connections 2 x dual-link DVI
1 x mini-HDMI

ZOTAC GeForce GTX 560 AMP!

The NVIDIA-exclusive board partners ZOTAC will send four different models in the dealer shelves to the launch of the GeForce GTX 560: A normal GeForce GTX 560 with an own cooler, a 2 GB version, a lightly overclocked version, as well as the AMP emerging in our! card, which is one of the frequencies on it. The map from the present day is to change hands for 189 euros.

ZOTAC GeForce GTX uses 560 AMP! comes on a 23.5 cm long PCB, which is an in-house development and therefore a black color. In the most cases the card should can be appropriately incorporate without major inconveniences. Two six pin power plug are necessary for the power supply. The LMP version from the wall outlet is to drag up to 171 Watts, while the normal OC model approved no more than 153 Watts himself and that is not overclocked cards 150 watts.

The cooling system is also from their own home, 560 TI 550 TI and GeForce GTX is but significantly different from the counterparts on the GeForce GTX. The heart is a copper block that is placed directly on the GF114-GPU. A large aluminium cooler was built over this, which is equipped with numerous lamellae and also “edited the power”.

Also, there are three heatpipes are connected to the copper block and the aluminium radiator. Two large in diameter 75 mm axial fans provide the necessary fresh air which temperature be controlled by a fan control.

ZOTAC GeForce GTX TMU domain added 560 AMP! with high 950 MHz, which has a Shaderfrequenz of 1,900 MHz result. The 1024 MB GDDR5 memory, which is manufactured by Samsung is working with 2,200 MHz. On Windows the components with the usual 51 MHz, 101 MHz or 135 MHz operate in order to save electricity.

On the bracket of the GeForce GTX 560 AMP! the buyer finds two dual-link DVI-as well as a mini-HDMI connector to 1.4a corresponding to the standard. As facilities, there are two electric power, a DVI to D-SUB-as well as a mini-HDMI to HDMI adapter. ZOTAC sets the box also have a driver CD, as well as a download coupon for the game “assassin’s creed: brotherhood” in.

< div >

ZOTAC GeForce GTX 560 AMP!
Feature Expression
PCB Design Own design
Length 23.5 cm
Power supply 2 x 6-pin
Cooler Design Custom design, 2 slot
Heat sink Copper core, aluminum radiator, three heatpipes
Fan 2 x 75 mm (axial)
Fan control Yes
Clock
Power (standby)
GPU 950 (51 MHz)
Shader 1900 MHz (101 MHz)
Memory 2,200 MHz (135 MHz)
Memory size 1024 MB GDDR5, Samsung
Connections 2 x dual-link DVI
1 x mini-HDMI 1.4a

Test results

Performance

On the following pages we present the speed of today’s counterparties – in different resolutions, quality settings, APIs and using PhysX in our renowned performance ratings. The ratings include, apart from the 3DMark 11 and mafia 2 PhysX, all tested 3D applications, their Einzelergebnisse now can be found in the annex. We not only on the summary ratings, but also indicate the major (negative as positive) riders in the individual benchmarks.

Performance without AA/AF

Performance rating – 1680 x 1050

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
178,9
AMD Radeon HD 6990
169.6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
141.5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
126,7
AMD Radeon HD 6970
122,6
ATi Radeon HD 5870
114.3
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
113,9
AMD Radeon HD 6950
112.7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
109,1
AMD Radeon HD 6870
105.8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
104,6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
ATi Radeon HD 5850
98.3
AMD Radeon HD 6850
90,4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
82,3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768
78,6
AMD Radeon HD 6790
75,4
ATi Radeon HD 5770
70.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TI
65,9
ATi Radeon HD 5750
58.7
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
54,9
AMD Radeon HD 6670
45.4
ATi Radeon HD 5670

40.6

Data in %

Performance rating – 1920 x 1200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
194,4
AMD Radeon HD 6990
187,4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
146,3
AMD Radeon HD 6970
130,9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
129,2
ATi Radeon HD 5870
120,2
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
120,2
AMD Radeon HD 6950
119,3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
111,0
AMD Radeon HD 6870
110,2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
105,2
ATi Radeon HD 5850
103,3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
AMD Radeon HD 6850
93.8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
83,8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768
79,2
AMD Radeon HD 6790
77.1
ATi Radeon HD 5770
71,6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TI
65.0
Data in %

The GeForce GTX 560 560 TI as on the GeForce GTX 460 geared clearly closer to the GeForce GTX. So is the difference to the TI card under 1680 x 1050 at nine percent, while there are 18 per cent to the earlier map. Values to 11 percent and 16 percent change under 1920 x 1200. The comparable AMD Radeon HD 6870 quicker is six or ten percent.

Performance rating – 2560 x 1600

AMD Radeon HD 6990
232,4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
215,6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
154.9
AMD Radeon HD 6970
146,7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
135,1
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
132.5
ATi Radeon HD 5870
132,3
AMD Radeon HD 6950
131,7
AMD Radeon HD 6870
117.3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
112,2
ATi Radeon HD 5850
111,6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
107,3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
AMD Radeon HD 6850
97,8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
82,3
Data in %

Under 2560 x 1600, the Radeon HD 6870 can then issue good 17 per cent of the GeForce GTX 560. The TI variant is quicker by 12 percent, the GeForce GTX 460 18 percent slower.

Significant outliers in the individual benchmarks:
We can see any abnormalities with the GeForce GTX 560. The graphics card certianly is consistently there one, where one would expect it from you: are lower than the GTX 460 between the GeForce GTX 560 TI and the GeForce GTX 460, where the differences to the TI go through.

Performance with AA/AF

Rating – 1680 x 1050, 4xAA/16xAF

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
204,4
AMD Radeon HD 6990
187,4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
145.6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
125,9
AMD Radeon HD 6970
122,3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
110,9
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
110,9
AMD Radeon HD 6950
109,8
ATi Radeon HD 5870
105.5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
101,7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
AMD Radeon HD 6870
94.0
ATi Radeon HD 5850
89,3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
83,4
AMD Radeon HD 6850
79,6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768
76,8
AMD Radeon HD 6790
69,9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TI
66,2
ATi Radeon HD 5770
61.2
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
53,6
ATi Radeon HD 5750
50,4
AMD Radeon HD 6670

42,1

ATi Radeon HD 5670

33.3

Data in %

Rating – 1920 x 1200 4xAA/16xAF

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
214,5
AMD Radeon HD 6990
206,6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
148,1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
128,9
AMD Radeon HD 6970
127,6
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
116,4
AMD Radeon HD 6950
115,6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
111,2
ATi Radeon HD 5870
109,8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
102,8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
AMD Radeon HD 6870
97.1
ATi Radeon HD 5850
93.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
84,1
AMD Radeon HD 6850
82.8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768
76,7
AMD Radeon HD 6790
72,4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TI
64.9
ATi Radeon HD 5770
63.9
Data in %

Rating – 2560 x 1600 4xAA/16xAF

AMD Radeon HD 6990
253,1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
237,0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
163,2
AMD Radeon HD 6970
147.5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
138,2
AMD Radeon HD 6950
129,2
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
119,6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
115,1
ATi Radeon HD 5870
112.5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
109,5
AMD Radeon HD 6870
100,2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
ATi Radeon HD 5850
95.3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
85.5
AMD Radeon HD 6850
84,9
Data in %

With the two quality-enhancing features, it looks as usual better for the GeForce GTX 560 compared to the competition from AMD. So the map under 1680 x 1050 now six percent faster than the Radeon HD 6870, see 1920 x 1200, it is still three percent. Under 2560 x 1600 the GeForce GTX 560 must be, however, satisfied with a tie. On the relationships with the GeForce GTX 560 TI and nothing has changed, however, to the GeForce GTX 460.

Rating – 1680 x 1050-8xAA/16xA

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
214,3
AMD Radeon HD 6990
201,7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
143.8
AMD Radeon HD 6970
125,5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
124,8
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
111,8
ATi Radeon HD 5870
110,7
AMD Radeon HD 6950
109,7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
109,3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
100,7
AMD Radeon HD 6870
100.0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
ATi Radeon HD 5850
94,8
AMD Radeon HD 6850
86.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
84,5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768
73.7
AMD Radeon HD 6790
69.7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TI
66.6
ATi Radeon HD 5770
63.9
ATi Radeon HD 5750
55,9
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
52.5
AMD Radeon HD 6670

42.6

ATi Radeon HD 5670

29.0

Data in %

Rating – 1920 x 1200 8xAA/16xAF

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
224,9
AMD Radeon HD 6990
216,3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
148,4
AMD Radeon HD 6970
128,0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
127,6
ATi Radeon HD 5870
116,8
AMD Radeon HD 6950
115.2
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
113,9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
109,6
AMD Radeon HD 6870
102,2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
102,0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
ATi Radeon HD 5850
96.8
AMD Radeon HD 6850
85,9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
84,4
AMD Radeon HD 6790
72.6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768
64.1
ATi Radeon HD 5770
63,3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TI
61.2
Data in %

Rating – 2560 x 1600 8xAA/16xAF

AMD Radeon HD 6990
367,9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
357,9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
220,6
AMD Radeon HD 6970
213,2
AMD Radeon HD 6950
189,0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
176,0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
144,6
ATi Radeon HD 5870
134,9
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
127,0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
123,1
AMD Radeon HD 6870
120.5
ATi Radeon HD 5850
112,2
AMD Radeon HD 6850
105,7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
94.7
Data in %

When achtfacher anti-aliasing, the GeForce GTX 560 at 1680 x 1050 earned a tie with the Radeon HD 6870. In the full-HD resolution renders the AMD card then two percent quicker, in the highest resolution to 21 percent slower – for the latter, but both products are absolutely too slow.

Significant outliers in the individual benchmarks:
And any special features of the GeForce GTX 560 fall on us even with turned on anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering. Only under 2560 x 1600 at eight x anti-aliasing, the GeForce GTX 560 suffers some shipwreck and can’t place hardly of the GeForce GTX 460.

The reason for this is to find, because there is only an extreme bucking of the GeForce GTX 560 in contrast to the competition from their own home in mass effect 2. Also renders the card in F1 2010 just quickly like the GeForce GTX 460. We assume in this regard a minor driver issue.

Performance according to API

Because different architectures benefit differently from different APIs, we have decided, in addition to create an own rating, with incorporated into it all values of a resolution (i.e. without anti-aliasing, 4xAA and 8xAA) for each DirectX level: performance ratings from a second perspective, so to speak.

DirectX 9

Rating – DirectX 9 1680 x 1050

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
180,7
AMD Radeon HD 6990
155,3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
136,5
AMD Radeon HD 6970
120,2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
120,0
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
111,9
ATi Radeon HD 5870
110.8
AMD Radeon HD 6950
110,1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
107,7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
102,2
AMD Radeon HD 6870
101,7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
ATi Radeon HD 5850
96.0
AMD Radeon HD 6850
89,1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
84,4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768
76,5
AMD Radeon HD 6790
71,6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TI
67.6
ATi Radeon HD 5770
66.7
ATi Radeon HD 5750
56,5
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
54.8
AMD Radeon HD 6670
45,1
ATi Radeon HD 5670

38.6

Data in %

Rating – DirectX 9 1920 x 1200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
196,2
AMD Radeon HD 6990
175,7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
142,4
AMD Radeon HD 6970
128,0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
124.4
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
119,3
AMD Radeon HD 6950
118,0
ATi Radeon HD 5870
116,6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
109,5
AMD Radeon HD 6870
106,4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
103,6
ATi Radeon HD 5850
100,8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
AMD Radeon HD 6850
93.7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
85,7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768
77.3
AMD Radeon HD 6790
73.6
ATi Radeon HD 5770
68,2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TI
65,3
Data in %

Rating – DirectX 9 2560 x 1600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
252,4
AMD Radeon HD 6990
246,7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
166,7
AMD Radeon HD 6970
164,6
AMD Radeon HD 6950
147,3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
141,0
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
135,5
ATi Radeon HD 5870
133.4
AMD Radeon HD 6870
118,3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
115,8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
115,4
ATi Radeon HD 5850
113,2
AMD Radeon HD 6850
102,2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
87.5
Data in %

DirectX 10

Rating – DirectX 10 1680 x 1050

AMD Radeon HD 6990
235,8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
215,1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
140,1
AMD Radeon HD 6970
135.2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
120,7
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
120,4
AMD Radeon HD 6950
119,8
ATi Radeon HD 5870
118,6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
110,3
AMD Radeon HD 6870
106,3
ATi Radeon HD 5850
100,8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
95.5
AMD Radeon HD 6850
89,4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
82.8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768
77,8
AMD Radeon HD 6790
75.2
ATi Radeon HD 5770
70,4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TI
66.0
ATi Radeon HD 5750
59,0
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

53.7

AMD Radeon HD 6670

45.6

ATi Radeon HD 5670

36.8

Data in %

Rating – DirectX 10 1920 x 1200

AMD Radeon HD 6990
250,9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
225,3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
142,2
AMD Radeon HD 6970
139,8
AMD Radeon HD 6950
124,9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
121,8
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
121,3
ATi Radeon HD 5870
120,6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
109,9
AMD Radeon HD 6870
108.6
ATi Radeon HD 5850
103,3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
94,4
AMD Radeon HD 6850
87,8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
83.6
AMD Radeon HD 6790
78,0
ATi Radeon HD 5770
70.9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768
64,8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TI
63.6
Data in %

Rating – DirectX 10 2560 x 1600

AMD Radeon HD 6990
348,3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
284,6
AMD Radeon HD 6970
188,1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
177.8
AMD Radeon HD 6950
167,0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
141,3
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
134,6
ATi Radeon HD 5870
133.3
AMD Radeon HD 6870
122,0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
113,9
ATi Radeon HD 5850
112,8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
112,1
AMD Radeon HD 6850
100,9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
83,9
Data in %

DirectX 11

Rating – DirectX 11 1680 x 1050

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
204,4
AMD Radeon HD 6990
191,6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
151,1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
133,1
AMD Radeon HD 6970
121,8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
111,6
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
110.0
AMD Radeon HD 6950
108,7
ATi Radeon HD 5870
107,1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
105.4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
AMD Radeon HD 6870
96.8
ATi Radeon HD 5850
90,4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
82,3
AMD Radeon HD 6850
80,9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768
76,8
AMD Radeon HD 6790
71,4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TI
64.9
ATi Radeon HD 5770
62,6
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
53.1
ATi Radeon HD 5750
52.4
AMD Radeon HD 6670

41,4

ATi Radeon HD 5670

31.7

Data in %

Rating – DirectX 11 1920 x 1200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
214,7
AMD Radeon HD 6990
207,1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
153,7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
135.0
AMD Radeon HD 6970
126,3
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
114,2
AMD Radeon HD 6950
113,4
ATi Radeon HD 5870
113,1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
112,1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
106,6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
AMD Radeon HD 6870
99.3
ATi Radeon HD 5850
93.8
AMD Radeon HD 6850
82.9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
82,7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768
75.8
AMD Radeon HD 6790
73.6
ATi Radeon HD 5770
64,3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TI
63.1
Data in %

Rating – DirectX 11 2560 x 1600

AMD Radeon HD 6990
256,4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
238,6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
170,9
AMD Radeon HD 6970
146,9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
146,9
AMD Radeon HD 6950
129,3
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
117.1
ATi Radeon HD 5870
116,2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
116,2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
114.9
AMD Radeon HD 6870
102,7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
100.0
ATi Radeon HD 5850
97,2
AMD Radeon HD 6850
86.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
85,0
Data in %

Performance with SSAA

With the current GPU generation there has been a step both ATi and NVIDIA in terms of image quality to the front. Because finally, both producers officially allow the use of Super sampling-anti-aliasing, which edited the whole image in contrast to the traditional anti-aliasing. The disadvantages are, however, in a huge hardware hunger, an incompatibility in certain games. ATi allows SSAA officially in the Control Panel, but only in DirectX 9 titles. NVIDIA SSAA is possible, however, under all APIs including DirectX 11, but it must be on a (NVIDIA own) external tool be used. This has the advantage to setting the SSAA samples regardless of the MSAA samples in contrast to the ATi implementation.

In addition, the LOD in use of SSAA is moved to ATi cards to achieve as an improved anisotropic filtering. The NVIDIA hardware leaves the LOD (at least yet) to standard. For reasons of comparability we limit ourselves with tests DirectX 9 games, as well as the resolutions 1680 x 1050 and 1920 x 1200. In the titles of call of duty: Modern warfare 2, we bring mass effect 2 and StarCraft 2 accordingly 4xSSAA added.

SSAA-benchmarks – 1680 x 1050

Call of duty MW2:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
79,7
AMD Radeon HD 6990
69,2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
50,7
AMD Radeon HD 6970
46.6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
45,5
ATi Radeon HD 5870
39.1
AMD Radeon HD 6950
38.8
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1 GB
38.7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TI
37.9
AMD Radeon HD 6870
37.4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
36.0
ATi Radeon HD 5850
34.8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
34.8
AMD Radeon HD 6850
30.2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
29.3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768
28.5
AMD Radeon HD 6790
28.2
ATi Radeon HD 5770

24.2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TI

23.0

ATi Radeon HD 5750

20.3

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

19.8

AMD Radeon HD 6670

17.2

ATi Radeon HD 5670

15.7

Mass effect 2:
AMD Radeon HD 6990
108,8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
101.8
AMD Radeon HD 6970
66.3
NVIDIA GeForce

Recent Computer Articles

Wood and plasma tv stands: the epitome of style and sustainability in the scenario

Written by Benedikt Kappel. Posted in Home – Garden & Home Improvement

There are various facets of modern technology which has fascinated many people. It is a well known fact that beautiful wooden tv stands because it offers an old and classic style to your television. Usually, it is better in the workplace elderly because they appreciate the sustainability to the modern style. You must ensure that that they are treated appropriately after the purchase. Many of them are very expensive and should be handled with...

Collaboration between Konica Minolta and Komori Corporation for commercial printing market

Written by Benedikt Kappel. Posted in News

Recently, the commercial print market uses more and more digital printing systems, the increasing of customers very changing missions, low volume and in the short term, and after the sharp rise of the impressions marketing ‘one-to-one’ and variable application request. Konica Minolta BT develops and produces systems digital printing for the market of the printing of production since 1999, on the basis of its extensive assortment of...

Income tax is obligatory and pre-registration

Written by Maike Lehrer. Posted in Finance – Stock Market And Stock Markets

In 2008, filing begins with 2/18. Such people forget VOL.3, US tax! And is rather high. You dispose of stock or mutual fund during the 2007 (transfer income, such as stocks that people) who is eligible, their choice is a general account of a special account or a special account at “withholding is” is, “without withholding information stated please check first. People have to tax The maximum cost is tax definitely...

Full live interview strategy linking the

Written by Swanhilda Hertzog. Posted in Commercial - Business & Economics

The interview is not a gamble. -Evaluating interviewer and elaboration. Interview is a logical process to evaluate you. Compatibility, or lucky, such vague isn’t saying. “See Tate says, also fell into! 」 “I’m always falls in the last interview! 」 “I was what I strained the good! 」 “For example is it if you answered the question? 」 In the toughest event produced and evaluated...

Insurance that if divorce becomes a single mother?

Written by Bernd Abt. Posted in Finance – Stock Market And Stock Markets

To his father’s security! So when single mothers, worst mother even children enough living expenses and school expenses, must be properly to ensure security. However, thinking different reason became a single mother. And because the bigger “bereavement” and divides into a divorce or unmarried birth “, but here, divorced or unwed birth (part from somebody below.)” of consider the case. Responsibility becomes...

Copyright © 2012 Computer Articles. All rights reserved.